<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Essential Computer Security &#187; Best Practices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tonybradley.com/tag/best-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tonybradley.com</link>
	<description>Computer Security In Plain English For Normal People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 04:41:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>VoIP Security: The Basics</title>
		<link>http://www.tonybradley.com/2009/07/voip-security-the-basics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tonybradley.com/2009/07/voip-security-the-basics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 13:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toll fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unified communications security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VoIP security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonybradley.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is no secret that VoIP is a popular and growing technology. VoIP, and its bigger, more converged, and feature-rich brother, unified communications, represent a significant shift in communications technology and a quantum evolution in how businesses leverage communications to improve productivity and increase efficiency. Bottom line- businesses that don&#8217;t have it now will have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is no secret that VoIP is a popular and growing technology. VoIP, and its bigger, more converged, and feature-rich brother, unified communications, represent a significant shift in communications technology and a quantum evolution in how businesses leverage communications to improve productivity and increase efficiency. Bottom line- businesses that don&#8217;t have it now will have it soon and new tools and technologies will continue to drive the adoption of VoIP and unified communications.</p>
<p>VoIP security is frequently talked about, but it is rare to hear of actual VoIP attacks. From both a theoretical and practical point of view there are a number of vulnerabilities and weaknesses in various VoIP implementations, but I think that the attackers are still working out their &#8216;business model&#8217; and examining how to go from exploit to income. So far it seems like the most prevalent attacks are old-fashioned toll fraud attacks against VoIP systems. Without a strategy to monetize the attack, there is little incentive to execute one. Once the Internet criminals of the world figure out how to make money from VoIP exploits the gloves will be off.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.csoonline.com/article/478577/VoIP_Security_The_Basics?page=3">recent article in CSOOnline.com by Bob Bradley</a> (Excellent last name! He must know what he is talking about), spells out some of the most prevalent security issues with VoIP, and some recommendations and best practices to guard against them. There are plenty of resources available, and a growing number of vendors and consulting companies dedicated to providing VoIP and unified communications security. It is the responsibility of CSO&#8217;s, CIO&#8217;s, and other IT mangement and security individuals to be informed about the threats and aware of the available mitigations and countermeasures to enure that their VoIP and unified communications environments are adequately protected.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.twitter.com/tonys3kur3"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: comic sans ms, sans-serif"><span style="FONT-SIZE: small">Follow me on Twitter</span></span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tonybradley.com/2009/07/voip-security-the-basics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Needs Antivirus Anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/who-needs-antivirus-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/who-needs-antivirus-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonybradley.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, actually, I believe the answer is &#8220;most people&#8221;. But, that is more a commentary on their level of information security savvy and common sense than a fear of the malware itself. Antivirus, which has now evolved in most cases to a multi-faceted antimalware suite to protect against viruses, worms, spyware, spam, phishing and more, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, actually, I believe the answer is &#8220;most people&#8221;. But, that is more a commentary on their level of information security savvy and common sense than a fear of the malware itself. Antivirus, which has now evolved in most cases to a multi-faceted antimalware suite to protect against viruses, worms, spyware, spam, phishing and more, is accepted as  default essential for home computer users and enterprise desktop systems alike. However, as Steve Riley points out in <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/steriley/archive/2007/09/22/antivirus-software-who-needs-it.aspx">this blog post</a>, computer professionals who have some common sense and show some discretion, mixed with just an ounce of information security knowledge, don&#8217;t really need the extra protection. Steve is not the only security expert I have met that feels that way either. The fact is that antimalware <span id="more-23"></span>software eats system resources and may impact the overall performance of your system. In extreme cases, it may even cause conflicts and system crashes.</p>
<p>One of the biggest problems with antimalware, however, is its reactive nature. While most products provide some sort of heuristic detection designed to catch new threats based on characteristics of previous known threats, it generally misses much more than it catches. So, the net result is a system where you are constantly updating your software to protect yourself against yesterday&#8217;s threats, but with no real protection against the threats of today or tomorrow.</p>
<p>As Steve points out in his blog, some of the other security controls built in to Windows Vista, such as UAC (User Account Control), Internet Explorer Protected Mode, WIC (Windows Integrity Control), and more provide more proactive security against malware and other threats without the need for constant updating. Using the security controls provided in Vista, and a little common sense, savvy computer users don&#8217;t really need antimalware protection.</p>
<p>Still, even the Windows Security Center in Vista will display as Yellow and warn you that your system is less than secure if you are not running a recognized antivirus product. The bottom line is, I agree with Steve when it comes to me, him, or other information security professionals. But, I think that the majority of home users and enterprise desktop users still benefit from having the antimalware software running to act as a little &#8220;digital common sense&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/who-needs-antivirus-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AutoComplete May Equal AutoCompromise</title>
		<link>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/autocomplete-may-equal-autocompromise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/autocomplete-may-equal-autocompromise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonybradley.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is very convenient to have your various usernames and passwords stored in your computer system. When you are logging into a web site or application, the information is automatically filled in for you so you don&#8217;t have to try to remember what alternate identity you used, or what unique variation of your password (or, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very convenient to have your various usernames and passwords stored in your computer system. When you are logging into a web site or application, the information is automatically filled in for you so you don&#8217;t have to try to remember what alternate identity you used, or what unique variation of your password (or, better yet, <a href="http://tonybradley.com/?p=16">passphrase</a>) you used when registering. Unfortunately, as with virtually everything that provides more convenience or efficiency for you, it also represents a security concern that can be leveraged by an attacker to more conveniently and efficiently compromise your system.<span id="more-21"></span></p>
<p>For example, you may like to check your bank account balances and reconcile your accounts via the bank web site. You used AutoComplete to remember your username and password so you can log in at the click of a button without having to recall your credentials. However, if any other person happens to sit down at your computer and click on the link for your personal banking web site, they too will be able to access your confidential information without having to recall&#8230;..er, hack, your credentials as well. Check out <a href="http://netsecurity.about.com/od/quicktips/qt/iestorepassword.htm">Disable AutoComplete Password Storage </a>on my About.com Internet / Network Security site for more about how to configure or disable this feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/autocomplete-may-equal-autocompromise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backing Up Data in Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/backing-up-data-in-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/backing-up-data-in-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard-drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norton-360]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows-Live-OneCare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonybradley.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back up your data!!! With more consumers relying solely on digital cameras to capture life&#8217;s moments, entire photographic and video histories are stored on computer hard drives. If you don&#8217;t back up your data, it could all be gone in the blink of a nanosecond. The latest trend in security suites is to include some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back up your data!!! With more consumers relying solely on digital cameras to capture life&#8217;s moments, entire photographic and video histories are stored on computer hard drives. If you don&#8217;t back up your data, it could all be gone in the blink of a nanosecond. The latest trend in <a href="http://netsecurity.about.com/od/readproductreviews/fr/msonecarelive.htm">security suites </a>is to include some type of maintenance and backup functionality, and Windows has included at least a rudimentary backup function for a while. Symantec takes it one step farther than the competition, providing<span id="more-20"></span> 2Gb of online space for free (and the ability to purchase more space if necessary) with their <a href="http://www.brighthub.com/Reviews/tabid/53/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/148/Protect-and-Maintain-Your-PCs-with-Norton-360.aspx">Norton 360 product</a>. The next step after developing the habit of backing up your data is to ensure you store a copy offsite, or somewhere that it won&#8217;t be destroyed in the same catastrophe that wipes out your hard drive. So, Symantec&#8217;s online backup helps users not only backup, but backup remotely. If you are using Windows Vista though, you may not need to use any additional software. The <a href="http://netsecurity.about.com/od/secureyourwindowspc/ss/vistabackup.htm">Backup and Restore Center</a> function in Vista is simple, intuitive and effective. Regardless of how you do it, just know that you must back up your data regularly and protect it so that it is available for you to restore if a tragedy strikes your computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/backing-up-data-in-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wireless Insecurity</title>
		<link>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/wireless-insecurity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/wireless-insecurity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonybradley.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been talking for years about the relative insecurity of wireless networks. Companies and consumers alike buy and implement wireless technology for its convenience, without stopping to consider the security implications. If you can sit on your couch in the living room and connect to the wireless router in your den, then your neighbor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been talking for years about the relative insecurity of wireless networks. Companies and consumers alike buy and implement wireless technology for its convenience, without stopping to consider the security implications. If you can sit on your couch in the living room and connect to the wireless router in your den, then your neighbor can probably connect from his house, or the guy sitting in his car parked<span id="more-18"></span> at the curb. Wireless airwaves do not discriminate. They travel as far as they can in whatever direction is available. Basic wireless security is just not that hard, so there is no excuse to be running a default, out-of-the-box wireless network with no encryption or security enabled. Still confused? Read this <a href="http://netsecurity.about.com/od/hackertools/a/aa072004b.htm">Introduction to Wireless Network Security</a> I wrote for my About.com site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/wireless-insecurity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware The Monster</title>
		<link>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/beware-the-monster/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/beware-the-monster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data-breach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monster.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonybradley.com/?p=17</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems like there are so many data breaches these days that the news of such events is more or less brushed aside. The public is becoming de-sensitized and just says &#8220;oh, another one of *those* new stories&#8221;. Recently, it was discovered that Monster.com, the popular job-hunting web site, was the victim of a breach [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like there are so many data breaches these days that the news of such events is more or less brushed aside. The public is becoming de-sensitized and just says &#8220;oh, another one of *those* new stories&#8221;. Recently, it was discovered that Monster.com, the popular job-hunting web site, <a href="http://netsecurity.about.com/b/a/256885.htm">was the victim of a breach </a>into their systems which compromised an estimated 1.3 million accounts. Monster.com has issued <a href="http://help.monster.com/besafe/email/">this notice</a>, which was also emailed out to registered members, and they have allegedly <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,295240,00.html">increased monitoring and security on their servers</a>.<span id="more-17"></span></p>
<p>The controversy is not over though.  Information continues to trickle out, such as the Monster.com résumé database being used to <a href="http://www.theregister.com/2007/08/23/monster_torpedoes_rogue_server/">pharm out malware</a>, or the fact that <a href="http://www.usajobs.gov/SecurityNotice.asp">146,000 accounts on USAJOBS</a>, the U.S. Government&#8217;s job search web site were also affected. Monster.com does seem to be acting to fix things. However, the fact that it took them <a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2174995,00.asp">5 days to acknowledge and announce </a>the data breach in the first place, or that they seem to either be relying on user apathy regarding data breaches or <a href="http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/01/1228234&amp;from=rss">affected by apathy </a>themselves is disconcerting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/beware-the-monster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Your Password Secure?</title>
		<link>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/is-your-password-secure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/is-your-password-secure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonybradley.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your passwords are the keys that keep your personal information and sensitive data locked away. If you choose a password that is easy to guess, like your dog&#8217;s name, or your wedding anniversary, anyone who knows anything about you can guess it and those who don&#8217;t know anything about you can probably find that type [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Your passwords are the keys that keep your personal information and sensitive data locked away. If you choose a password that is easy to guess, like your dog&#8217;s name, or your wedding anniversary, anyone who knows anything about you can guess it and those who don&#8217;t know anything about you can probably find that type of information. You want to make sure you choose a password that others won&#8217;t guess and that will not be easy to crack. When I wrote <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1597491144/ref=cm_arms_pdp_dp/102-2656109-3120163">Essential Computer Security</a>, I ran this little test<span id="more-16"></span> of password cracking to determine how long it might take an attacker to crack your password: </font></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Using a freely available password recovery utility called Cain &amp; Abel v2.5 I was able to discover the passwords below in the following timeframes using an AMD 2500+ CPU with 512Mb memory:</font></p>
<p><strong><u><font face="Times New Roman">Password<span>                    </span>Attack<span>                         </span>Time</font></u></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">john<span>                             </span>Dictionary <span>                  </span>&lt;1 minute</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">john4376<span>                     </span>Dictionary <span>                  </span>attack failed</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"><span>                                    </span>Brute<span>                           </span>&gt;12 hours</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">j0hN4376%$$<span>             </span>Dictionary<span>                   </span>attack failed</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman"><span>                                    </span>Brute<span>                          </span>attack failed</font></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><font face="Times New Roman">Of course, if you make the password so complex that you can&#8217;t recall it yourself, it sort of defeats the purpose. You can learn more about password security, and more importantly some tips and tricks to help you create complex passwords that are virtually impossible to crack, but that are still simple enough for you to remember them by reading my article, <a href="http://netsecurity.about.com/cs/generalsecurity/a/aa112103b.htm">Creating Secure Passwords</a>, on my <a href="http://netsecurity.about.com">About.com Internet / Network Security </a>site. </font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/is-your-password-secure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protect Yourself From Phishing Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/protect-yourself-from-phishing-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/protect-yourself-from-phishing-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonybradley.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you received any emails lately about your eBay or Paypal account being suspended due to suspected fraud? Perhaps you have been notified by a financial institution (often a bank that you do not even do business with in the first place), that they have upgraded their systems and they need you to click on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you received any emails lately about your eBay or Paypal account being suspended due to suspected fraud? Perhaps you have been notified by a financial institution (often a bank that you do not even do business with in the first place), that they have upgraded their systems and they need you to click on a link to enter your username and password for verification. These are examples of phishing attacks, or phishing scams. The email is the &#8220;bait&#8221; to lure you (the &#8220;phish&#8221;) into surrendering sensitive or confidential information such as your passwords or credit card numbers. You can protect yourself against becoming a phishing victim by following the 5 simple steps I outlined in this <a href="http://netsecurity.about.com/od/security101/a/phishprotect.htm">About.com Internet / Network Security article</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/09/protect-yourself-from-phishing-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 5 Anti-Spyware Products</title>
		<link>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/08/top-5-anti-spyware-products/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/08/top-5-anti-spyware-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 14:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony Bradley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard-drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[partition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows-Vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonybradley.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Top 5 antispyware products available for 2009 with brief overviews of each and links to learn more or download/purchase the software.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To tell the truth, these are almost the only 5 products worth considering, not just the top. There are hundreds of anti-spyware products available, including many that claim to be anti-spyware but are malware products in and of themselves. Products like these 5 (Windows Defender, AdAware Personal SE, Spybot Search &amp; Destroy, Webroot Spy Sweeper, and McAfee Anti-Spyware) represent commercial products from vendors you can trust.<span id="more-8"></span></p>
<p>Many users actually get their anti-spyware protection through a security suite such as Norton 360, or Trend Micro PC-Cillin Internet Security Suite. To find out how these 5 products rank, along with some insight into their strengths and weaknesses, check out <a href="http://netforbeginners.about.com/od/antivirusantispyware/a/anti_malware07.htm">this article from Paul Gil</a>, About.com Guide of Internet for Beginners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tonybradley.com/2007/08/top-5-anti-spyware-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
